Some time ago I addressed several interesting points in “3D Printers Will Change the World as We Know It.” At the time, the biggest risk being predicted was whether manufacturers would be able protect intellectual property rights from those access to a 3D printer could replicate their product.
Well, more concerns and potential issues surrounding 3D manufacturing and product liability have cropped up since then. 3D printing allows for new processes in manufacturing, which could possibly expose businesses to unanticipated liabilities. At the heart of the matter is consumer behavior.
Up until now, most product liability laws state that manufactures are only liable for product defects in design, manufacturing, or warnings for the product’s intended use. But 3D printing opens the door wide for products to be modified or misused, forcing manufacturers to grapple with foreseeable misuse.
Manufacturers are already responsible for foreseeable misuses of their products, even if used in way not originally intended. But what if consumers use 3D printing to designs that make a once safe product dangerous?
Will manufacturers have to predict how consumers may modify the original design and have to revise the product warnings to prevent consumer injuries? In the future, will manufactures have to put restrictions on what can be produced by 3D printing? There are not currently any examples of such cases, but they’re likely not far down the road.
Product liability case rulings concerning software and information are based on whether the information or software is a product. Most are not, so strict liability rarely applies.
Embedded software is what drives 3D printers, but they also use software to produce or print each specific product. Obviously the printer itself can malfunction due to a software glitch and produce defective products for which the manufacturer is liable. But will courts look at the developers of embedded software as service providers or as manufacturers/suppliers of components in 3D manufacturing?
So far, the courts haven’t needed to wrestle with that, but they will. Software is an intangible product. 3D printing cases will force the courts to re-examine their stance of not holding users liable. There are two ways this will impact businesses:
Disclaimers, indemnity clauses and insurance requirements are ways in which companies transfer the risk of liability to other parties. These insulations from liability will become even more important when managing new risks in the world of 3D manufacturing. Of course, those with whom they do business will find ways to push back.
3D printing is creating new and exciting opportunities for the development and customization of products. But businesses need to take into account potential product liability issues that are sure to follow.
3014 Devine St.
P.O. Box 5866
Columbia, SC 29250
1-800-622-7370 Toll Free